• Core
  •  
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Alden Library
  • Students & Future Residents
  • Residents & Fellows
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Leadership Administration Governance
Menu Name
CRO Home
CRO Support & Services
Idea Development
Protocol/Proposal Development
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Navigation
Funding (travel & seed funding)
Research Design & Statistical Analysis
Guidance in Effective Literature Review
Editing
Dissemination
Research Educational Presentations & Programs
Research Requirements & Opportunities
Frequently Used Forms
CORE Research Office News
Contact Us
Acronyms
Links
Contact Info

 

 

 

Upcoming Events

2009 OOA/CORE Poster Exhibition and Competition

Call for Abstracts

OOA/CORE 2009 Research Competition call for abstracts

The abstract deadline has been extended to May 8 for the OOA/CORE 2009 Research Poster Exhibition and Competition, which will take place at the 111th OOA Convention.

The poster exhibition is open to students, interns, residents, faculty and physicians presenting clinical/biomedical research, case reports or health policy/educational issues.

The poster competition is restricted to student, intern and resident projects, and must be either clinical/biomedical research or case reports.

  • Deadline extension: Friday, May 8
  • Submit abstracts to Grace Brannan at brannang@ohio.edu.
  • OOA Convention: June 18-21, Kalahari Waterpark Resort and Nia Conference Center in Sandusky, Ohio
  • Poster judging: June 20, 8:30 a.m.

Guidelines and Required Elements

Bio-Medical and Clinical Research

These elements should be considered in the judging process:

5 elements are content related, 1 element is based on oral communication skills, and the last element deals with the poster’s overall visual presentation.

I.          Content:

  • Title and Author(s)
    • The title should summarize the work and stimulate the viewer to read the poster.  Names of the principal investigator and all co-authors should be indicated, along with respective affiliations.
  • Introduction
    • The introduction should clearly state the purpose and objectives of the project and should describe how it builds on existing work.
  • Methodology
    • Methodology consists of a brief description of the target sample, including sample size and demographics if relevant, as well as the general design of the study (retrospective chart review, experimental design, survey-based design, qualitative research, etc.) and statistical analysis.
  • Results
    • Results must be clearly presented and appropriately summarized.  Tables, charts, graphs, and other visuals are encouraged.
  • Conclusion
    • Conclusions must be based on study results and should emphasize the significance and implications of the study.

II.        Oral Elements:

  • Communication
    • Participants will be expected to respond to questions and to be able to explain their projects clearly.

III.       Visual Elements:

  • Overall Visual Appeal
    • Consider the poster’s organization, clarity, visibility, and attractiveness of design.


Guidelines and Required Elements

Single Case Study

These elements should be considered in the judging process:

5 elements are content related, 1 element is based on oral communication skills, and the last element deals with the poster’s overall visual presentation.

I.          Content:

  • Title and Author(s)
    • The title should summarize the work and stimulate the viewer to read the poster. Names of the principal investigator and all co-authors should be indicated, along with respective affiliations.
  • Introduction
    • The introduction should briefly and clearly introduce the clinical presentation being discussed.  It should provide some general information about and/or characteristics of the clinical presentation. 
  • Case Description
    • The case description should describe the specific case being presented.  It should provide information and those test and lab results relevant to an understanding of the progression of the case – relevant positive and pertinent negative results; it should offer normal levels for unusual tests.  It should present information in chronological order.
  • Discussion
    • The discussion should document the unique value of the case, drawing from the literature to justify the clinical value of the single case study being presented.  It should provide some comparison of the presented case with a “normal” clinical presentation or document the rare nature of the presented case.
  • Conclusion
    • Conclusions (if included) should be directed toward identifying the clinical value of the single case study and should offer recommendations on the detection or care of similar cases.

II.        Oral Elements:

  • Communication
    • Participants will be expected to respond to questions and to be able to explain their projects clearly.

III.       Visual Elements:

  • Overall Visual Appeal
    • Consider the poster’s organization, clarity, visibility, and attractiveness of design.

 

© 2009 Centers for Osteopathic Research and Education (CORE).
Please direct any questions or suggestions about this website to the webmaster.